I finally bought the Madshus Eon with a
waxable base. I bought them on clearance
back in September 2015. I believe they
are from the 2012-2013 production. They
do not have the current black-yellow top sheet- they are silver.
My pair is 205cm (the longest you can get
an Eon).
The Eon is the slimmest of Madshus’
“xcountry-downhill” (XCD) series. I
would describe the Madshus XCDs as hybrid alpine touring/telemark-xcountry
skis. They do not offer the classic
xcountry performance of a stiff, double-cambered backcountry-xcountry ski. They are a less efficient xcountry ski than a
Scandinavian backcountry ski (i.e. “fjellski”) as well. They are designed to offer “modern” (i.e.
Alpine) downhill performance- while still being light enough to xcountry ski
with.
(The Madshus XCD line is a carbon copy of
the last generation Karhu XCDs: Eon= XCD GT; Epoch= XCD 10th
Mountain; Annum= Guide)
Fischer’s S-Bound series is designed to
offer similar performance. In my
experience the S-Bounds seem to be a little more weighted towards climbing and
downhill skiing. The S-Bounds in general
have more of a parabolic profile, and the waxless “off-track crown” on the
S-Bounds is clearly designed for climbing traction. The S-Bounds, in general, do have a stiffer
flex pattern than the Madshus XCDs- this in general offers better performance
on dense/hard snow than the Madshus XCDs.
(There are a number of other manufactures
of this hybrid class of Nordic skis including Rossignol (e.g. BC90, BC110,
BC125) and Alpina (e.g. Discovery series))
Specs
Here is a summary of the Eon Waxable specs:
- Profile:
83-62-70mm
- “Single-cambered”
- Flex
pattern: smooth, even, soft flex, with a slightly-rockered tip
- Full-length
steel edges
- Low-profile
tip
- Track
groove
- Sintered,
waxable base
The Eon is often described as being
“camber-and-a-half”…from my perspective the Eon is clearly a single-cambered
ski. The Eon is, in my experience,
noticeably stiffer than its wider siblings- the Epoch and the Annum- this
contrast may be the primary reason for referring to the Eon as
“camber-and-a-half”. It is also
available in longer lengths. A 205cm Eon
has noticeably more “camber” than a 195cm Eon.
Like the Epoch and the Annum, the Eon has a
smooth, soft, flex. This flex pattern
offers good performance on fresh, soft snow- brutally inefficient on dense/hard
snow.
The Madshus XCDs are slightly-rockered in
the tip- UTE magazine described the Eon as having approx. 10cm of rocker in the
tip. (This is quite different than
Fischer’s “Nordic rocker”, but in my experience, produces similar early-tip
rise- at least in a xcountry K&G context).
The slightly open tips of the Eon are very noticeable when initiating
downhill turns.
The Eon, unlike a traditional BC-XC ski, has
a low profile tip (i.e. more like an Alpine ski).
The waxable Eon has a high-quality sintered
base. I have hot-glide waxed them, and
grip-waxed the traction zone underfoot.
They hold wax very well- and they are very fast.
This winter- I will be testing this ski
against a 205cm&195cm waxless Eon; as well as a 210cm Asnes USGI Combat ski
(waxable).
Quality and Durability
There has been much apprehension about the
build-quality of Madshus XCDs being built in China. My family (my wife and I have 4 children at
home) has multiple sizes of the Eon, Epoch and Annum. I personally have put well over
1000kms/season on my 205cm waxless Eons over the last 6 years. I must confess we have never had any problems
with these skis. My waxless Eons, in
particular, take some serious abuse in late-winter, early-spring skiing through
the woods.
Xcountry Performance
From a traditional perspective- the Eon is
not a very efficient xcountry ski- it is not stiff enough to offer an efficient
Nordic “kick”. (Although I do find that
the Eon with an NNN-BC binding offers more “snap” than with a NN-75mm-3 pin
binding). The xcountry “kick and glide”
performance of the Eon is greatly affected by the length of ski that you
choose. For example, at my weight
(185lbs) I get significantly better K&G performance on my 205cm Eons than
on my wife’s 195cm.
I have tested the current Fischer E-109- it
is significantly stiffer and more cambered- the E-109 is a much more efficient
xcountry ski than the Eon.
My Asnes Combat skis (see my review) are
much stiffer and more cambered than the Eon- they offer much more efficient
K&G performance then the Eon.
The waxable Eon is significantly faster
than the waxless Eon- it’s actually amazing how much faster it is! And with appropriate grip waxing- I get
better K&G and climbing traction than the waxless Eon- in most snow
conditions that I ski in (cold snow).
The waxless Eon still shines in warm wet snow though- I am certainly not
going to part with them!
All of this being said- the Eon is a very
popular backcountry-xcountry touring ski.
Many, many people appreciate the “relaxed, smooth ride” (and of course
the downhill performance). The Eon is
noticeably straighter and stiffer through the tail, than the tip. As a result- the Eon tracks very well for a
ski with so much sidecut (though it does not track as straight as my Asnes
Combat skis). I understand why people
like the Eon as a xcountry ski- though I personally wish it had a stiffer flex
pattern.
Another excellent use of the Eon is for a
backcountry ski for children (or very light skiers). The flex pattern of the Eon is soft enough
that children can control a 165cm Eon from a relatively early age. My oldest daughter (who is still as light as
a feather), for example, has been on a 165cm Eon since she was 7 years
old. Finding BC-Nordic skis for children
can be a real challenge- learning how to ski on fresh snow, on a stiff,
cambered ski, is no fun for anyone!
Climbing Performance
With appropriate us of grip wax I can climb
a much steeper slope than I can with the waxless Eon (the waxless “Omnitrack”
on the Eon is clearly designed for K&G performance- not climbing). I have yet to deal with grip wax and a
climbing skin…
Downhill Performance
The Eon offers what I would call “moderate”
downhill turning performance…
This has to be put in context…
In fact, compared to
a traditional BC-XC ski (with a stiff flex/camber), the Eon offers excellent
“modern” (i.e. Alpine) downhill performance- the slightly open tips, and ample
sidecut, offer decent turn initiation, and a reasonable turn-radius. However, compared to other hybrid
telemark-xcountry Nordic skis- the Eon’s relatively straight, stiff, tail make
it a less efficient turner than skis with a more uniform, parabolic profile and
flex pattern. I personally think that
the performance of the Eon is more weighted towards xcountry performance, than
many of the other hybrid skis available.
Effectively steering the Eon requires quite a powerful boot/binding-
unless you are on ideal snow/terrain. I
ski the Eon with a NNN-BC binding (currently the Alpina Alaska for a boot) - I
find the Eon is easier to manage by using a striding-technique to
initiate/complete my downhill turns.
Obviously the Eon would be easier for me to steer in a short length- but
then I would lose all of the xcountry performance this ski has to offer.
Flotation
A “powder” ski the Eon is not. Even with that 83mm tip, I find the Eon is
not fat enough (or perhaps long enough- depending on your perspective) to offer
enough flotation in truly deep powder.
(My 195cm Annums are much more efficient than the Eon, in truly deep
powder). Part of the problem is that
sidecut- the Eon is only 62mm underfoot- this significantly reduces the
effective flotation of the Eon. (My
Asnes Combat skis (67mm underfoot) offer significantly better flotation than
the Eon). I would actually prefer an Eon
with less sidecut- and more width underfoot.
I find that the Eon offers effective
flotation in up to about 16 inches of fresh, soft snow. In my neck of the woods- I typically have up
to 2 feet of fresh snow on top of a very dense base- in these conditions- the
Eon performs very well.
The other issue is the fact that the Eon is very soft-flexing, and reverse-flexes very easily. While this may be in fact an advantage when downhill skiing on soft snow- it seriously compromises XC performance on soft snow. There is not enough resistance in the flex of the Eon to support the ski's waist in a powerful Nordic kick. I find that in deep snow, when I push down to stride forward, the ski reverse-flexes- causing the waist to sink into the abyss with the tip and tail floating on top of the snow!
Conclusions
Here are my current conclusions:
- The Eon,
in general, is an excellent XCD touring ski on fresh, snow over a dense
base. It offers reasonable xcountry
performance- with decent downhill performance.
- In order
to fully take advantage of the xcountry performance- you must ignore what
the “experts” tell you: don’t “size-down”- “size-up”!! If you truly want to cover lots of
distance with this ski- get as long an Eon as you can. The Eon is so soft-flexing that even the
lightest of skiers can effectively ski a long length. (As a xcountry-focused ski, I would buy
a 215cm Eon- if I could only get one!)
- The
waxable Eon is a much “better” (i.e. faster, better traction) ski than the
waxless- but only if you get enough cold snow to take advantage of
it. I much prefer the waxable base-
but I would not be without a waxless ski for skiing on wet “spring”
snow. Klister works better than
waxless- but keep your klister out of the woods!
- If your
backcountry skiing is on gentle to moderate terrain and takes more of a
xcountry-focus- you may be disappointed with the Eon. It does not have the stiff flex pattern
of a traditional BC-XC. However, if
you are not so performance-orientated- you may find the “smooth, relaxed
ride” of the Eon to be perfect for your skiing style.
- The Eon
is an excellent backcountry ski for children and very light skiers- due to
its smooth, soft flex.
- From my perspective I think that the Eon would offer more powerful performance if there was more resistance to its flex-pattern. I find the Eon is just to soft and reverse-flexes too easily. I push my skis very hard to perform- the Eon does not have enough flex-stiffness to respond!
In conclusion- the Eon is a well-designed, and very capable and versatile mid-width XCD ski. It is easy to like- and easy to handle. Combine that with a very reasonable price-
its popularity is well deserved.
The greater performance of the waxable base
is well worth the bit of extra maintenance!
No comments:
Post a Comment